2013-VIL-09-SC-DT

Equivalent Citation: [2013] 358 ITR 371

Supreme Court of India

Appeal (Civil) No(s). 14013/2013

Date: 30.09.2013

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I

Vs

M/s RELIANCE ENERGY LTD.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv., Mr. D.L. Chidananda, Adv., Mr. Sahil Tagotra, Adv., Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.
For the Respondent : Mr. G. C. Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Preeti Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Aditya Parda, Adv., Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv.

BENCH

R. M. Lodha And Shiva Kirti Singh,JJ.

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the Revenue submits that the question involved in the present special leave petition is in respect of retrospectivity of Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'Act') and, therefore, the decision of the Bombay High Court in Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)-I Vs. M/s Delta Air Lines Inc. has no application and the High Court erred in dismissing the appeal preferred by the Revenue while keeping the question of retrospectivity of Section 234D open.

Learned counsel for the assessee places reliance on Explanation (2) inserted in Section 234D of the Act by the Finance Act, 2012 with effect from 01.06.2003.

Explanation (2) which has been inserted in Section 234D of the Act reads as under :-

"Explanation 2. - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the provisions of this section shall also apply to an assessment year commencing before the 1st day of June, 2003 if the proceedings in respect of such assessment year is completed after the said date."

The High Court was concerned with the appeal relating to the assessment year 1998-99. It is admitted case that the assessment of that year was completed prior to 01.06.2003. Having regard to the legal position which has been clarified by the Parliament by insertion of Explanation (2) in Section 234D of the Act, in the present case, retrospectivity of Section 234D does not arise.

Having regard to above position, the view of the High Court in relying upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in M/s Delta Air Lines Inc. (supra) cannot be said to be erroneous.

Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.